Organizational Behavior for Communication Ethics- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theOrganizational Behavior for Communication Ethics and Crisis. Answer: Introduction Within an organization, several employees are employed, who belong to different socio-cultural background. In the orientation program, the employees are instructed to expose decent behavior, which proves beneficial in luring the customers. Here, the employees are asked to give their approval towards the levied instructions. In most of the cases, the employees disagree to the implemented decisions. This disagreement relates with the theme of the discussion, organizational behavior (Wrench, 2013). As a matter of specification, it agree-disagree are the behavioral approaches of the individuals towards the events, which takes place in their surroundings. In terms of the behavioral theory, maturity is one of the integral aspects, which needs to be present in the behavior of the employees. On the contrary, if an employee exposes immature behavior towards the introduced activities, it is a negative connotation to the behavioral theory. This essay establishes a comparative study between the aspects of speech and silence in the workplace. Significance of communication in workplace Communication is one of an important aspect, which deals with the transmission of thoughts, feelings and emotions from one person to another. This is carried out in oral, written or through sign languages. Mostly, oral form of communication is followed in the workplaces (Knapp and Hall, 2013). Along with this, sign languages are also followed for involving the physically and mentally challenged employees into the activities undertaken by the companies and organizations. Viewing it from the other perspective, communication enhances the preconceived skills of the employees and other personnel. Typical examples in this direction are presentations, which enhances the confidence of the personnel towards speaking in front of many audiences. Herein, the employees undergoing inferiority complex, for giving presentations, attains an important position. It is at this stage that the statement possesses direct relationship (Kuhnke, 2013). As a matter of specification, the statement can be divided into three parts. The first part is some people say; second part is the you dont say and the third part is what you say. The phrase more important reflects the relationship between the second and the third part. Biasness in the word some people itself generates conflicts and difference of opinions between the employees, which nullifies the fact that whether they remained silent or raised their voice towards the activities undertaken by the companies and organizations. On the other hand, this some people can be the business critiques, who express their opinions towards the steps taken by the industries. In this case, speech gains preference over silence in terms of evaluating the effectiveness of the undertaken steps (Wood, 2013). Both of these connotations are the outcomes of behavioral tendencies, which attain expression upon the observation of the circumstances. Pondering upon the aspect of dont say, it possesses several connotations. One, it might relate to the employees who are physically and mentally challenged. Along with this, it can also be the employees, who prefer to remain neutral in response to the undertaken activities. Herein, the true essence of speech is contradicted. Viewing it from the other perspective, it can also reflect the suppression of the bosses to remain silent, which is a distortion to the participative management style (Oetzel and Ting-Toomey, 2013). Moreover, it also projects the snatching away of the right to speech, which bears correlation with the aspect of entrapping the employees and making them slaves of the bosses. Here, silence gets preference over speech, as many of the employees fear to raise their voice over the bosses. Here the much needed maturity attains a negative connotation. Delving deep into the two orders, dont say is just an addition to say. In view of this connotation, it reflects the control of the senior and the experienced employees over the juniors. It is at this stage that communication at workplace attains negative connotation. Typical examples here are using slang languages and physical-mental abuse, which reduces the moral of the employees, compelling them to undertake turnover. This is applicable especially for the employees, who are deaf and dumb (Lloyd, 2013). Herein lays the inappropriate utilization of sign languages, which aggravates the intensity of discriminations within workplace. Workplace problems The previous segment, in terms of the proposed statement sheds light on the potential challenges and issues, which assumes a major shape in the workplace. Among these challenges, communication is a major issue of concern, which destroys the feeling of oneness in terms of taking the company or organization to the peak of success. Communication barriers are a live example of how misinterpretations can affect the individuality of an employee (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016). For example, an employee, hailing originally from India, gets employed in one of the Australian companies, is bullied by the senior and experienced employees for not knowing the Australian English accent. When the Indian employee complains the management about this incident, he is threatened by the senior and the experienced employees, not to say a wrong word against them, as the company operates on their instructions. This example relates with the second part of the statement, where the senior and the experienced employees regulate the junior employees in terms of the execution of the allocated activities. Delving deep into the issue, not knowing the Australian English accent is not a crime; it is not possible for an individual to learn all the accents of a language. In this sense, exerting mental and physically tortures upon the freshers is not at all apt in terms of the self-respect of all the employees. All these aspects strain the relationship between the employees (De Gruyter Mouton, 2013). If attention is given towards the stage, where the Indian employee goes to the management to complain about the experience, which he encountered, several issues come to the forefront. One, if the manager patiently listens to what the employee has to say, it reflects the conscious approach of the manager towards the wellbeing of the employees. On the other hand, if the manager neglects the issue by saying that he would look into the matter, if he gets time. The second expression reflects lackadaisical attitude of the manager towards maintaining the order and harmony of the workplace (Holmes and Maria, 2014). Moreover, it also strains the stability in the relationship between the employees and the management. Herein, lays the appropriateness of the part of the quotation, dont say. Apart from this, this type of behavior is against the designation offered to the manager. Apart from this, if the manager entrusts the responsibility of the settlement on the employees, it would be creative, in terms of management practices. On the contrary, if the employees fail to fulfill this duty, it would reflect that they are selfish towards securing their position instead of the feeling of collaborative working for the achievement of identified and the specified goals (Ferrell, Fraedrich and Linda, 2016). Herein, the business critiques can be placed in the place of some people, who take the responsibility of reviewing the workplace operations. According to their opinions, in times of crisis, the quotation, what you dont say may be more important than what you say. In view of the statements of the managers, you can be correlated to the employees, the managers or the company and organization as a whole. Sayings are the approach of the personnel towards the efficient execution of the allocated duties and responsibilities. Recommendations In view of the crisis period, remaining silent bestows efficient means of negotiations to the employees. In the circumstances, making much noise makes the knowledge vessel of the employees empty, compelling them to encounter severe losses. Therefore, in order to restore the order, decorum and harmony of the workplace, the companies and organizations need to organize frequent group discussions. Involvement of each and every employee in these discussions is necessary in terms of gaining awareness towards their approach towards the activities, which are undertaken (Groom, Alyssa and Janie, 2014). In case of the deaf and dumb employees, sign languages need to be adopted, so that they do not feel neglected. However, rational thinking is utmost important here as one wrong step can hurt their individual sentiments. Along with this, training can be organized for the employees on effective communication in workplace. Increasing the frequency of trainings would help the employees to attain an easy grasp over the basic communication skills needed in the workplace. Moreover, it would nullify the selfish, dont say from the minds of the senior and the experienced employees in terms of grabbing the hot seat (Holmes, Janet and Maria, 2014). The employees need to undergo persistent practice of polishing their communicative skills. Attending Spoken English classes can be an effective option. This would provide the employees with a platform for enhancing their communication, as required in the workplace. Along with this, it would enhance their personality, where petty issues like pressurization of the senior and the experienced employees would not matter much. In this sense, the behavior needed in the organization attains a positive connotation. Enhancement of personality would reate positive image in the minds of the other employees. One of the other examples is providing the deaf and dumb employees with the opportunity to give presentations before the foreign delegates. This would improve their confidence and improve the stability in the relationship between the employees and management. References Ferrell, O.C, John Fraedrich and Linda Ferrell, Business Ethics (Cengage learning, 2014) Groom, S. Alyssa and Janie M. Harden Fritz (2014) Communication Ethics And Crisis Herring, Susan C, Dieter Stein and Tuija Virtanen, Pragmatics Of Computer-Mediated Communication (De Gruyter Mouton, 2013) Holmes, Janet and Maria Stubbe (2014), Power And Politeness In The Workplace Knapp, M. and Hall, J. (2013).Nonverbal Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter. Kuhnke, E. (2013). Communication skills for dummies. Chichester: Wiley Lloyd, Kenneth L, Office Idiots (The Career Press, Inc., 2013) Oetzel, J. and Ting-Toomey, S. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Talking At Work (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016) Wood, J. (2013). Interpersonal communication. Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Wrench, J. (2013).Workplace communication for the 21st century. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.